I’ve carried a Panasonic LX100 in a belt pouch for 2.5 years. It’s awkwardly large for a compact camera, but the lens is very sharp, and it has the multi-aspect ratio sensor, capable of shooting in 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 aspect ratios with full field of view and maximum megapixels. I love multi-aspect, but the LX100 is a tank to always carry. Many would prefer the also very capable, and much smaller and lighter, 1″ sensor compacts.
[Incidentally, my LX100 is hardly useable after 2.5 years of everyday use. The lcd (including EVF) often posterizes, so colors and detail become mush. I’m so familiar with it that I can often still take good photos, but it’s really a handicap, and I can’t even check to see how the photos turn out until the glitching stops, which is random, and seems to be almost all the time now. At the end of the 2-year, extended warranty, it was still intermittent enough that I thought they might not see the problem if I had sent it in.]
This video doesn’t show many image comparisons, and doesn’t explain what multi-aspect offers with the LX100, but is still interesting.
12MP 1/3″ sensor
28mm and 56mm fixed lenses
Very poor color and resolution in low light
12.8MP M4/3rds sensor (much larger sensor has much larger pixels that gather more light)
24-75mm very high quality zoom lens
Sharpness and color much better
More recoverable highlight and shadow detail — dynamic range
• • •
Camera Showdown: iPhone 7 vs Advanced Compact | How Far Have Smartphone Cameras Come?
Published on Feb 25, 2017